World Health Education Initiative

  

   
Contents
Introduction
Deaths
Theory
Problem
Shame
Education
Future
Internet
Training
Money
Plan
Research
Learning
Causes
FAQ 1
FAQ 2
FAQ 3
FAQ 4
Action
Contact

First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win. Mahatma Gandhi

 
    
Frequently Asked Questions Part Five
    
Shaun Kerry, M.D.
Diplomate, American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology

Q.  The most fundamental problem as I see it, is that we have moved the rationing decision away from the user of the service, to some third party.  Years ago, each

person had to make the rationing decision, i.e. could they afford that care or not.  Today, that decision has basically been moved to some third party.  The problem with this new scheme, is there is no way to effectively hold down the cost of medical inflation.  Before the advent of our modern health delivery system, medical cost inflation was lower than the overall inflation rate.  Since the move to this current system, the medical inflation rate has consistently been above the overall inflation rate.  As a result, these third parties come up with all kinds of schemes to hold down the rising cost of healthcare.  An economist would say, this is rationing.  But the problem is, this form of rationing never works, because you have not changed the supply/demand dynamics at work.  All you have done is bought yourself some time.  I see only two ways out of this problem.  One, is to return the rationing decision to the consumer (not very likely), or some dramatic productivity improvements that reduce the overall cost of providing that care. 
  A.  Before the days of HMO's, there were severe economic healthcare problems.  HMO's were contrived as a solution - a solution which has failed.  This website does offer a dramatic productivity change, in addition to removing what now consists of a massive restraint of trade.  But in order to appreciate that, you have to read the entire group of sites, taking your time to digest the material.  You could say that HMO's are a cause, but not a root cause.  There is little that we can do directly about HMO's.  But if we communicate effectively the concepts on this web site, the root causes will be exposed, and in time, corrected.  Given that, society may have little need for HMO's.

Q. More doctors do not lower price.  As current research confirms (from

Dartmouth), if there are a lot of doctors in an area, they simply double the number of required office visits.

A.  That makes sense at the present time.   So we need a new breed of doctor.  When a doctor leaves medical school now, he or she is $300,000 in debt and often damaged by the many years of forced memorization.  The cost is passed on to the consumer.

PRINTABLE  PAGE    |   BACK   |   TOP     NEXT   |   PRINTABLE  SITE

     
                                          © Copyright 1999-2002 by World Prosperity, Ltd.  All rit reserved.